execution-plan/weeks/week-33-labdocs-ingestion-and-traceability/commitment.md · UPDATED 2026-09-16

Week 33 commitment

3 parts431 words 6 checkboxes — tick them, they save to the file

State: UNCONFIRMED. Owner: Peter Ciancaglini. Specification

Start date: not set. End date: not set. Available hours: confirm (planned ceiling 10). Primary outcome: labdocs ingestion and traceability. Minimum that keeps the next gate alive: Demonstrate one synthetic document becoming a traceable eLabFTW record with a documented audit event.

Deliverables to commit

document-benchmark-manifest.csv: Demonstrate one synthetic document becoming a traceable eLabFTW record with a documented audit event.
labdocs-ingestion-runbook.md: A small end-to-end extraction creates a traceable demo record.
traceability-design.md: The test demonstrates tamper detection and documents what it cannot prevent.
Bounded learning exercise and personal teach-back.
Evidence-backed branding and opportunity pack.
Sunday review and next physical action.

↑ Back to top

Proposed calendar

Day	Minutes	Physical action / outcome	Actual slot	Done
Mon	90	Define a synthetic document benchmark up to the v4 200-document target with ground truth, document IDs and realistic error cases.	Not set	[ ]
Tue	90	One concise applied note, a worked decision/example and unresolved questions.	Not set	[ ]
Wed	90	Specify eLabFTW deployment/API integration and local VLM extraction with provenance, retries and validation. Last ten minutes: optional note.	Not set	[ ]
Thu	90	One concise applied note, a worked decision/example and unresolved questions. Include relevant founder-paper work within this block.	Not set	[ ]
Fri	90	Implement event identity, timestamps, revisions and hash-linked audit events; document access-control, retention and tampering limits.	Not set	[ ]
Sat	90	Resolve critical spillover; long-form draft if due; sandbox only if done.	Not set	[ ]
Sun	60	Build log, evidence, gap review, next actions.	Not set	[ ]

↑ Back to top

Dependency and capacity check

Missing essential inputs: not yet inspected.
Human/external dependency, owner and expected date: not yet inspected.
Week-specific constraint: Hash chaining alone does not establish regulatory compliance. Study current official rules and apply a requirements mapping; this remains a research demonstration.
Existing session authorization for external actions or spending: not assessed; local planning only at scaffold creation.
Scope to cut first: optional polish/additional examples; preserve scientific validity.
If the forecast exceeds available time: record a concrete reduced scope or revised delivery proposal before committing.

Peter's commitment / adjustments: pending. Reviewing model and date: pending.

↑ Back to top