# Week 33 commitment

State: UNCONFIRMED. Owner: Peter Ciancaglini. [Specification](./specs.md)

Start date: not set. End date: not set. Available hours: confirm (planned ceiling 10).
Primary outcome: labdocs ingestion and traceability.
Minimum that keeps the next gate alive: Demonstrate one synthetic document becoming a traceable eLabFTW record with a documented audit event.

## Deliverables to commit

- [ ] `document-benchmark-manifest.csv`: Demonstrate one synthetic document becoming a traceable eLabFTW record with a documented audit event.
- [ ] `labdocs-ingestion-runbook.md`: A small end-to-end extraction creates a traceable demo record.
- [ ] `traceability-design.md`: The test demonstrates tamper detection and documents what it cannot prevent.
- [ ] Bounded learning exercise and personal teach-back.
- [ ] Evidence-backed branding and opportunity pack.
- [ ] Sunday review and next physical action.

## Proposed calendar

| Day | Minutes | Physical action / outcome | Actual slot | Done |
|---|---:|---|---|---|
| Mon | 90 | Define a synthetic document benchmark up to the v4 200-document target with ground truth, document IDs and realistic error cases. | Not set | [ ] |
| Tue | 90 | One concise applied note, a worked decision/example and unresolved questions. | Not set | [ ] |
| Wed | 90 | Specify eLabFTW deployment/API integration and local VLM extraction with provenance, retries and validation. Last ten minutes: optional note. | Not set | [ ] |
| Thu | 90 | One concise applied note, a worked decision/example and unresolved questions. Include relevant founder-paper work within this block. | Not set | [ ] |
| Fri | 90 | Implement event identity, timestamps, revisions and hash-linked audit events; document access-control, retention and tampering limits. | Not set | [ ] |
| Sat | 90 | Resolve critical spillover; long-form draft if due; sandbox only if done. | Not set | [ ] |
| Sun | 60 | Build log, evidence, gap review, next actions. | Not set | [ ] |

## Dependency and capacity check

- Missing essential inputs: not yet inspected.
- Human/external dependency, owner and expected date: not yet inspected.
- Week-specific constraint: Hash chaining alone does not establish regulatory compliance. Study current official rules and apply a requirements mapping; this remains a research demonstration.
- Existing session authorization for external actions or spending: not assessed; local planning only at scaffold creation.
- Scope to cut first: optional polish/additional examples; preserve scientific validity.
- If the forecast exceeds available time: record a concrete reduced scope or revised delivery proposal before committing.

Peter's commitment / adjustments: pending.
Reviewing model and date: pending.