execution-plan/weeks/week-18-paper-2-full-draft/commitment.md

execution-plan/weeks/week-18-paper-2-full-draft/commitment.md Β· UPDATED 2026-09-16

Week 18 commitment

3 parts388 words 6 checkboxes β€” tick them, they save to the file

State: UNCONFIRMED. Owner: Peter Ciancaglini. Specification

Start date: not set. End date: not set. Available hours: confirm (planned ceiling 10). Primary outcome: paper 2 full draft. Minimum that keeps the next gate alive: Results section.

01

01

Deliverables to commit

  • paper-2-introduction.md: The scope is one simulated bioprocess benchmark.
  • paper-2-methods-results.md: Plots, tables and numerical claims match machine-readable results.
  • paper-2-review-package.md: Missing experiments or assumptions are disclosed and review questions are concrete.
  • Bounded learning exercise and personal teach-back.
  • Evidence-backed branding and opportunity pack.
  • Sunday review and next physical action.
↑ Back to top
02

02

Proposed calendar

Day Minutes Physical action / outcome Actual slot Done
Mon 90 Write problem, prior hybrid/soft-sensor benchmarks and the exact contribution with verified references. Not set [ ]
Tue 90 Outreach lines drafted Not set [ ]
Wed 90 Write methods and results from the frozen experiment matrix including null or adverse comparisons. Last ten minutes: optional note. Not set [ ]
Thu 90 Paper 2 rewritten with the checklist Include relevant founder-paper work within this block. Not set [ ]
Fri 90 Write limitations and reproducibility statement; apply the research checklist and schedule the human review. Not set [ ]
Sat 90 Resolve critical spillover; long-form draft if due; sandbox only if done. Not set [ ]
Sun 60 Build log, evidence, gap review, next actions. Not set [ ]
↑ Back to top
03

03

Dependency and capacity check

  • Missing essential inputs: not yet inspected.
  • Human/external dependency, owner and expected date: not yet inspected.
  • Week-specific constraint: Do not generalize one simulated process to production performance or industrial savings. Main narrative follows measured learning curves.
  • Existing session authorization for external actions or spending: not assessed; local planning only at scaffold creation.
  • Scope to cut first: optional polish/additional examples; preserve scientific validity.
  • If the forecast exceeds available time: record a concrete reduced scope or revised delivery proposal before committing.

Peter's commitment / adjustments: pending. Reviewing model and date: pending.

↑ Back to top
⏱ Focus Focus25:00 0 min today