# Week 18 commitment

State: UNCONFIRMED. Owner: Peter Ciancaglini. [Specification](./specs.md)

Start date: not set. End date: not set. Available hours: confirm (planned ceiling 10).
Primary outcome: paper 2 full draft.
Minimum that keeps the next gate alive: Results section.

## Deliverables to commit

- [ ] `paper-2-introduction.md`: The scope is one simulated bioprocess benchmark.
- [ ] `paper-2-methods-results.md`: Plots, tables and numerical claims match machine-readable results.
- [ ] `paper-2-review-package.md`: Missing experiments or assumptions are disclosed and review questions are concrete.
- [ ] Bounded learning exercise and personal teach-back.
- [ ] Evidence-backed branding and opportunity pack.
- [ ] Sunday review and next physical action.

## Proposed calendar

| Day | Minutes | Physical action / outcome | Actual slot | Done |
|---|---:|---|---|---|
| Mon | 90 | Write problem, prior hybrid/soft-sensor benchmarks and the exact contribution with verified references. | Not set | [ ] |
| Tue | 90 | Outreach lines drafted | Not set | [ ] |
| Wed | 90 | Write methods and results from the frozen experiment matrix including null or adverse comparisons. Last ten minutes: optional note. | Not set | [ ] |
| Thu | 90 | Paper 2 rewritten with the checklist Include relevant founder-paper work within this block. | Not set | [ ] |
| Fri | 90 | Write limitations and reproducibility statement; apply the research checklist and schedule the human review. | Not set | [ ] |
| Sat | 90 | Resolve critical spillover; long-form draft if due; sandbox only if done. | Not set | [ ] |
| Sun | 60 | Build log, evidence, gap review, next actions. | Not set | [ ] |

## Dependency and capacity check

- Missing essential inputs: not yet inspected.
- Human/external dependency, owner and expected date: not yet inspected.
- Week-specific constraint: Do not generalize one simulated process to production performance or industrial savings. Main narrative follows measured learning curves.
- Existing session authorization for external actions or spending: not assessed; local planning only at scaffold creation.
- Scope to cut first: optional polish/additional examples; preserve scientific validity.
- If the forecast exceeds available time: record a concrete reduced scope or revised delivery proposal before committing.

Peter's commitment / adjustments: pending.
Reviewing model and date: pending.
