execution-plan/weeks/week-09-fermlit-scale-up/commitment.md · UPDATED 2026-09-16

Week 09 commitment

3 parts422 words 6 checkboxes — tick them, they save to the file

State: UNCONFIRMED. Owner: Peter Ciancaglini. Specification

Start date: not set. End date: not set. Available hours: confirm (planned ceiling 10). Primary outcome: fermlit scale up. Minimum that keeps the next gate alive: the completeness table.

Deliverables to commit

corpus-scale-manifest.csv: Every included paper has a stable identity and eligible full text.
extraction-cost-report.csv: Success/failure counts, token or local-runtime use and measured cost are recorded.
completeness-table.csv: Not reported, not extracted and unavailable full text remain separate categories.
Bounded learning exercise and personal teach-back.
Evidence-backed branding and opportunity pack.
Sunday review and next physical action.

↑ Back to top

Proposed calendar

Day	Minutes	Physical action / outcome	Actual slot	Done
Mon	90	Expand the screened corpus toward 2,000 papers; deduplicate preprint/journal versions and record exclusions and license restrictions.	Not set	[ ]
Tue	90	Mass balances for batch, fed-batch, continuous in a notebook	Not set	[ ]
Wed	90	Run the selected backend with resumable jobs, retry limits, caching, quality checks and a small paid pilot before bulk execution. Last ten minutes: optional note.	Not set	[ ]
Thu	90	Bigram model on organism names from FermLit Include relevant founder-paper work within this block.	Not set	[ ]
Fri	90	Produce the field completeness table by organism/year with a manually checked missingness sample.	Not set	[ ]
Sat	90	Resolve critical spillover; long-form draft if due; sandbox only if done.	Not set	[ ]
Sun	60	Build log, evidence, gap review, next actions.	Not set	[ ]

↑ Back to top

Dependency and capacity check

Missing essential inputs: not yet inspected.
Human/external dependency, owner and expected date: not yet inspected.
Week-specific constraint: Two thousand is a target, not an inclusion rule. Automated failure is not evidence that authors omitted a field; disclose selection bias and stop runs at the agreed budget.
Existing session authorization for external actions or spending: not assessed; local planning only at scaffold creation.
Scope to cut first: optional polish/additional examples; preserve scientific validity.
If the forecast exceeds available time: record a concrete reduced scope or revised delivery proposal before committing.

Peter's commitment / adjustments: pending. Reviewing model and date: pending.

↑ Back to top