Now the junior analyst meets the answer key. You build extract/agent.py with two brains, a frontier model through the API and a local Qwen on your 3050, plus a fake brain for tests. Then you do the thing that distinguishes an AI scientist from an AI enthusiast: you measure it per field, not as one flattering average. It will be very good at "organism" and bad at "working volume", and that unevenness is the finding. …
If you only do one thing this week: the F1 table, whatever it says
Stanford Online · Statistical Learning with Python
Saturday sandbox
· after James, Witten, Hastie, Tibshirani & Taylor, An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applica…
Stanford Online · Statistical Learning with Python (Hastie, Tibshirani et al.) — Playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoROMvodv4rPP6braWoRt5UCXYZ71GZIQ · course page: online.stanford.edu/courses/sohs-ystatslearningp-statistical-learning-python. Moved out of core on 2026-09-29
By Sunday you should be able to say: “I can read my own F1 table aloud, say why the worst field fails, and explain why tuning on the gold set is dangerous.”