execution-plan/weeks/week-14-paper-1-full-draft/commitment.md · UPDATED 2026-09-16

Week 14 commitment

3 parts408 words 6 checkboxes — tick them, they save to the file

State: UNCONFIRMED. Owner: Peter Ciancaglini. Specification

Start date: not set. End date: not set. Available hours: confirm (planned ceiling 10). Primary outcome: paper 1 full draft. Minimum that keeps the next gate alive: Methods section.

Deliverables to commit

paper-1-introduction.md: Each contribution corresponds to an implemented method or measured result.
paper-1-methods.md: A reader can identify data versions, splits, prompts, annotators and scoring rules.
paper-1-results.md: Effect sizes and denominators accompany comparisons; judge output is not ground truth.
Bounded learning exercise and personal teach-back.
Evidence-backed branding and opportunity pack.
Sunday review and next physical action.

↑ Back to top

Proposed calendar

Day	Minutes	Physical action / outcome	Actual slot	Done
Mon	90	Write introduction and related work from verified sources, stating novelty or extension accurately.	Not set	[ ]
Tue	90	Multiple-testing correction applied to a FermLit comparison	Not set	[ ]
Wed	90	Write reproducible corpus, schema, annotation, extraction and evaluation methods with availability statement. Last ten minutes: optional note.	Not set	[ ]
Thu	90	Calibrated judge for FermLit fields Include relevant founder-paper work within this block.	Not set	[ ]
Fri	90	Write results and limitations, apply the planned multiple-testing correction and evaluate any fuzzy-field judge against humans.	Not set	[ ]
Sat	90	Resolve critical spillover; long-form draft if due; sandbox only if done.	Not set	[ ]
Sun	60	Build log, evidence, gap review, next actions.	Not set	[ ]

↑ Back to top

Dependency and capacity check

Missing essential inputs: not yet inspected.
Human/external dependency, owner and expected date: not yet inspected.
Week-specific constraint: Do not use an LLM judge to erase strain-level mistakes or support a reporting-completeness claim without manual validation. Unsupported hypotheses stay in limitations or future work.
Existing session authorization for external actions or spending: not assessed; local planning only at scaffold creation.
Scope to cut first: optional polish/additional examples; preserve scientific validity.
If the forecast exceeds available time: record a concrete reduced scope or revised delivery proposal before committing.

Peter's commitment / adjustments: pending. Reviewing model and date: pending.

↑ Back to top