Week 01 review and handoff

• A repeatable trajectory and balance checks exist; any lag-phase behavior is explicitly modeled. Evidence: pending.
• A timestamped sample can be traced from generator to rendered curve. Evidence: pending.
• Twenty reproducible outputs have known ground truth and no implied plant validation. Evidence: pending.
• Learning assessed from Peter's actual answers. Evidence: pending.
• Branding/opportunity states recorded correctly. Evidence: pending.

What Peter can explain or reproduce now: not assessed. Quiz / teach-back gaps: not assessed. Measured result and limitations: pending. Best evidence link for a scientist/recruiter/buyer: pending. What failed or changed, and why: pending.

Gate requirement: No standalone gate; check this week's acceptance criteria and next gate dependencies. Gate status: NOT_STARTED. Original target week: See next gate in specs. Actual completion date / forecast: not set. Missing external evidence: pending inspection. Blocks completed / 7: not recorded. Days with commits / 7: not recorded. Sunday build log / optional Wednesday note: not recorded. Founder conversations cumulative: not recorded. Earned evidence level and proof: not assessed. Consecutive lost weeks: not assessed.

Week-specific risk to revisit: A basic Monod model does not automatically produce lag and death phases. Eighty lines is a presentation idea, not a correctness criterion; do not force artificial physiology to match the title.

Continue / recover / blocked: not decided. Retain as the minimum: monod.py with the plot. Skipped permanently with reason: none recorded. Carryover with owner, dependency and target week: none recorded. Canonical repository paths and versions: pending. Data permissions, split definitions or assumptions to preserve: pending. External action authorization that still applies: not assessed. Next physical action, exact file/function/paragraph: pending. Updates to root PROGRESS / LOG / TODAY completed: [ ]

Next week