# Week 35 commitment

State: UNCONFIRMED. Owner: Peter Ciancaglini. [Specification](./specs.md)

Start date: not set. End date: not set. Available hours: confirm (planned ceiling 10).
Primary outcome: labdocs release and local benchmark.
Minimum that keeps the next gate alive: Prepare a reproducible labdocs release with one measured local-hardware benchmark and a visible human-review step.

## Deliverables to commit

- [ ] `deviation-workflow.md`: Prepare a reproducible labdocs release with one measured local-hardware benchmark and a visible human-review step.
- [ ] `hardware-benchmark.csv`: Actual device specs, settings and sample counts are given; unavailable hardware is marked untested.
- [ ] `labdocs-release-checklist.md`: Fake mode and a clean local reproduction work; release/deposit status is evidenced.
- [ ] Bounded learning exercise and personal teach-back.
- [ ] Evidence-backed branding and opportunity pack.
- [ ] Sunday review and next physical action.

## Proposed calendar

| Day | Minutes | Physical action / outcome | Actual slot | Done |
|---|---:|---|---|---|
| Mon | 90 | Connect a batchlens alarm and relevant SOP to a deviation draft with a visible human-review state and supporting evidence. | Not set | [ ] |
| Tue | 90 | One concise applied note, a worked decision/example and unresolved questions. | Not set | [ ] |
| Wed | 90 | Benchmark the available mini PC, RTX 3050 and permitted cloud comparator on identical cases, logging accuracy, latency, memory and measured costs. Last ten minutes: optional note. | Not set | [ ] |
| Thu | 90 | One concise applied note, a worked decision/example and unresolved questions. Include relevant founder-paper work within this block. | Not set | [ ] |
| Fri | 90 | Package labdocs v0.1/Z6, reproduce the benchmark and prepare deployment/data-flow documentation. | Not set | [ ] |
| Sat | 90 | Resolve critical spillover; long-form draft if due; sandbox only if done. | Not set | [ ] |
| Sun | 60 | Build log, evidence, gap review, next actions. | Not set | [ ] |

## Dependency and capacity check

- Missing essential inputs: not yet inspected.
- Human/external dependency, owner and expected date: not yet inspected.
- Week-specific constraint: Do not repeat the inherited USD 300 hardware claim as current pricing. No client records go to cloud comparators without an applicable data-use basis and authorization.
- Existing session authorization for external actions or spending: not assessed; local planning only at scaffold creation.
- Scope to cut first: optional polish/additional examples; preserve scientific validity.
- If the forecast exceeds available time: record a concrete reduced scope or revised delivery proposal before committing.

Peter's commitment / adjustments: pending.
Reviewing model and date: pending.