# Week 23 commitment

State: UNCONFIRMED. Owner: Peter Ciancaglini. [Specification](./specs.md)

Start date: not set. End date: not set. Available hours: confirm (planned ceiling 10).
Primary outcome: extremophile candidate ranking.
Minimum that keeps the next gate alive: Produce five traceable candidate entries with uncertainty, sequence provenance and partner-relevance rationale.

## Deliverables to commit

- [ ] `candidate-source-manifest.csv`: Produce five traceable candidate entries with uncertainty, sequence provenance and partner-relevance rationale.
- [ ] `ranked-candidates.csv`: Every candidate has evidence, confidence limits and limitations; scores are not laboratory results.
- [ ] `partner-candidate-dossier.md`: Partner can assess feasibility and choose candidates without a hidden model assumption.
- [ ] Bounded learning exercise and personal teach-back.
- [ ] Evidence-backed branding and opportunity pack.
- [ ] Sunday review and next physical action.

## Proposed calendar

| Day | Minutes | Physical action / outcome | Actual slot | Done |
|---|---:|---|---|---|
| Mon | 90 | Define the partner enzyme family, organism scope and assay-compatible inclusion rules; acquire versioned UniProt records. | Not set | [ ] |
| Tue | 90 | One concise applied note, a worked decision/example and unresolved questions. | Not set | [ ] |
| Wed | 90 | Predict/rank candidates with uncertainty, similarity-to-training and out-of-domain flags; include simple baseline rankings. Last ten minutes: optional note. | Not set | [ ] |
| Thu | 90 | One concise applied note, a worked decision/example and unresolved questions. Include relevant founder-paper work within this block. | Not set | [ ] |
| Fri | 90 | Prepare a candidate dossier and collaboration note covering contribution, data access, publication intent and dependencies. | Not set | [ ] |
| Sat | 90 | Resolve critical spillover; long-form draft if due; sandbox only if done. | Not set | [ ] |
| Sun | 60 | Build log, evidence, gap review, next actions. | Not set | [ ] |

## Dependency and capacity check

- Missing essential inputs: not yet inspected.
- Human/external dependency, owner and expected date: not yet inspected.
- Week-specific constraint: If partner material is confidential, keep public-data analysis separate. No invented extremophile labels or claims of discovering a superior enzyme.
- Existing session authorization for external actions or spending: not assessed; local planning only at scaffold creation.
- Scope to cut first: optional polish/additional examples; preserve scientific validity.
- If the forecast exceeds available time: record a concrete reduced scope or revised delivery proposal before committing.

Peter's commitment / adjustments: pending.
Reviewing model and date: pending.